Piers Morgan’s $100K Gamble on Brigitte Macron’s Gender Backfires Spectacularly: Candace Owens Demands Payment After French Court Ruling

In a media spectacle that has left both fans and critics stunned, British TV host Piers Morgan now faces the reality of a $100,000 bet gone sideways—all thanks to a controversial claim about the gender of French First Lady Brigitte Macron.

The drama, which began as a heated online debate between Morgan and outspoken commentator Candace Owens, has escalated into an international talking point, raising questions about truth, defamation, and the price of public wagers in the age of viral outrage.

The Bet That Shocked the Internet

It all started when Candace Owens, a prominent conservative commentator known for her provocative takes, doubled down on the long-circulating rumor that Brigitte Macron, wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, was assigned male at birth.

Owens cited “journalistic investigations” and her own research as the basis for her claims, fueling a firestorm online and drawing both support and condemnation from across the political spectrum.

Piers Morgan, never one to shy away from controversy, publicly challenged Owens on social media. In a move that would later haunt him, Morgan offered to bet Owens $100,000 that her assertion was false, confident that the claim would be debunked and that the First Lady’s gender was not up for debate.

Legal Drama Unfolds in France

The plot thickened when a French appeals court recently cleared two journalists of defamation after they had publicly echoed the same claims Owens promoted.

The court’s decision was widely interpreted as a blow to the Macrons’ efforts to quash rumors and misinformation. However, the ruling did not confirm or deny the substance of the rumors; it merely stated that the journalists’ statements did not constitute defamation under French law.

For Candace Owens, the court’s decision was a green light. She immediately took to social media, declaring that Morgan’s challenge had failed and demanding that he pay up.

“I won’t let Piers Morgan off the hook,” she wrote, insisting that the court’s ruling validated her position and that Morgan owed her the promised $100,000.

A Social Media Firestorm

The story quickly went viral, with hashtags like #PiersMorganBet and #BrigitteMacron trending on Twitter and other platforms. Supporters of Owens cheered her persistence, while Morgan’s fans argued that the court’s decision was not a factual confirmation of the rumor, but rather a legal technicality.

Comedian Kurt Metzger, who has followed the story closely, weighed in on Twitter, highlighting the absurdity of the situation and questioning whether Morgan would actually pay the money.

“This is the kind of bet you make when you’re sure you’re right—or when you want to make headlines,” Metzger joked.

The Real Stakes: Truth, Reputation, and Clicks

Beyond the spectacle, the incident raises important questions about the boundaries of free speech, the role of the courts in policing misinformation, and the ethics of high-stakes public challenges.

While the French court’s ruling may have protected the journalists from legal liability, it left the underlying rumor unaddressed, allowing speculation and conspiracy theories to flourish.

For Piers Morgan, the episode is a stark reminder of the risks of making public bets in the digital age. As a media personality known for his confrontational style, Morgan has often found himself at the center of controversy—but rarely with so much money on the line.

Candace Owens, meanwhile, has leveraged the moment to reinforce her brand as a fearless truth-teller, unafraid to take on powerful figures and mainstream narratives. Whether or not she ever sees the $100,000, Owens has already won in the court of public opinion among her followers.

What Happens Next?

As of this writing, Piers Morgan has not publicly commented on whether he intends to honor the bet. Legal experts note that informal wagers made on social media are rarely enforceable in court, but the reputational stakes may be even higher than the financial ones.

The Macrons have remained largely silent, choosing not to dignify the rumors with a response. However, the persistence of such stories—now amplified by a high-profile bet and a controversial court ruling—underscores the challenges public figures face in an age where rumors can spread globally in seconds.

The Bottom Line

The Piers Morgan–Candace Owens bet over Brigitte Macron’s gender is more than just a bizarre footnote in the annals of internet drama. It’s a case study in how misinformation, legal ambiguity, and the relentless pursuit of clicks can combine to create a media firestorm with real-world consequences.

As the dust settles, one thing is clear: in the era of social media, the line between fact and fiction is blurrier than ever—and sometimes, the biggest losers aren’t the ones who lose a bet, but the ones who get caught in the crossfire.